|
|
|
PHILIP J. SHERMAN
STATESMAN
|
|
Unfornately 2008 is not the year that I get to start helping
the people. The people have chosen to not make their government any better than it is. They have said that we
don't need any help, nor do we want any from anybody. Stanley Cox 1234 or so Pettis County Votes Philip J. Sherman
369 or so Pettis County Votes
Ten Top Reasons
Why YOU Should Vote for Philip J. Sherman 10. A Vote
For the Future
A Youthful and Serious Approach
9.
Problem solver, a Telephone Call or E-mail Away
philipjsherman@gmail.com
660-287-5717
8. Always Voting for the issues that Matter to District 118
Roads, schools,
and family 6. Working Hard for You
When
Elected I will Always by Working Hard for You as a Representative 5. An On-Going Communicator
Ready and willing to take on the issues that matter to Our District 4. The kind of Candidate that you would have coffee with
And still
get issues taken care of
3. Lifetime Member of Our Community
2. Keeping You Well Informed on the Issues
Protecting
the Public from unneeded Legislation, Laws, and Regulations 1. I
Promise to Represent All of the Citizens of District 118 and not
just a Select Few All opinions deserved to be heard!
Philip
J. Sherman will Always be Lending a Special Hand to the Children, the Handicapped, and the Eldery who have a Hard Time having
their Voices Heard.
As we look to the future, we
see great needs in our nation. We live in the greatest nation on earth, but there are gaps in our country—gaps of immorality,
gaps of poverty, gaps of disrespect for the faith and values on which our country was founded. The only way to fill these
gaps is through prayer.
Government and Religion do the two belong together.
This is the Great Debate that can be heard
in more and more Churches Today.
James Wilson, a Founding Father, Signer of the U.S. Constitution, the Original
U.S. Supreme Court Justice and author of the first commentary on the Constitution believed and said that it did. He said,
"Indeed reglion and law are twin sisters". "These two sides run into each other." Who better than him
to know the actual intent that our founding fathers had for our Constitution.
The Ten Commandments are repeatly
coming up on the Evening News all the across the Country.
But unfortunately few know that the 10 Commandments
first appeared in our system of government when the Commonwealth of Virginia included it in their Virginia Code in 1610-1611.
Another fact is that 12 of the 13 colonies included the 10 Commandments in their laws and regulations.
These
and other other issues are surfacing all across this Great Country of ours.
However Romans 13:1 says, "Everyone
must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities
that exist have been established by God."
This means that if the Government has any authority whatsoever,
it has to come from God as there is no other source of authority.
Therefore Government and Religion are Intertwined
together. 7. Always listening to the Voters of District 118!
Ready to listen to your thoughts, ideas, and opinions |
|
Welcome
to the Website of Philip J. Sherman
Go Ahead, have a look around and see what you find.
“There
is nothing wrong with signing legislation at a Christian school. Church services themselves were held in the U.S. Capitol
for members of Congress and the public at the dawn of our Republic.” – Tony Perkins
We must remain
active participants and “never tire of doing what is right.”(2 Thess. 3:13)
Go to the Government
page
to learn about the U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Glover Roberts
and what both sides have to
say about him.
Go to the Foundations Page
to see Future Plans.
Go to the Schedule of Events
to see what I'm doing.
Here are some Letters to the Editor that I have written.
Dear Mr. Editor
During this time of peace in the United States we need to remember our military forces, those serving abroad and those serving
at their military posts or armory, whatever the case may be. If our military would not be willing to go overseas to fight
terrorists or other enemies of freedom, our country would be just like every other country in the world and we would have
a war here at home every once in a while.
I personally know this as I am a member of the Missouri Army National
Guard and have myself been deployed during operation Enduring Freedom, which has gone on during our current war for the freedom
of Iraq. I was deployed to become an MP or Military policeman so that I could take the state side or garrison position of
an active duty MP. This would then free this soldier and unit up, so that they could go patrol Iraq and Afghanistan.
If you don’t vote then why should our men and women fight for our freedoms at all? I’d also like to mention
that I’m the young man running for State Representative in District 118, (Sedalia’s District). To learn more about
me please go to my website www.philipjsherman.org. One last thing that I would like to mention to the Sedalia Democrat is
that it is not okay to have a couple of women laying around in their lingerie on the front cover of the TV guide or any where
else in the newspaper either.
Dear: Editor
I wish everyone in this country had great intentions
just like our founding fathers did.
The U.S. Supreme Court in 1963, wanted to find out what percent of the population
believed in God when it was deciding whether prayer, of a non-denominational type was okay in our public schools. It found
that 97% of the country believed in God in some way and that only 3 percent did not believe in God at all. The 22 word prayer
that they were ruling on said the word, God, once. No other strong vocabulary was used. Eight years later it was called a
“to whom it may concern” prayer when the same court revisited the same prayer in a different. It was a bland prayer,
yet unfortunately to this country’s upheaval as a society since, it then sided with the 3 percent, saying that this
prayer could not be allowed. Never before had 3 percent been a majority. It is quite clear when one looks at the facts that
our U.S. Supreme Court at the time either did not know their history or they chose to ignore the truth. Consider these facts
of early America.
When Thomas Jefferson was our nation’s 3rd President, (he is considered to be the least
religious of our founding fathers), he went to church every Sunday at the U.S. Capitol Building. He decided he could get better
worship music there since he was the President, so he went and ordered the U.S. Marine Corp. band to play there every Sunday
morning for the worship service. Later, he decided to start a church on his side of Washington D.C., since the capitol building
was a few miles from the White House, so he started a church in the War building and one in the Treasury building.
It
is clear that not even Thomas Jefferson would have wanted our country to get God out of our public buildings.
Benjamin
Rush, who was another famous founding father, got the idea of a public education system started in 1791, because, “some
might not know the gospel”. Talking about the gospel of Christ.
James Wilson, original U.S. Supreme Court justice
and signer of the Constitution said, “religion and law are twin sisters”. Surely he was qualified to know the
full intent of the Constitution. For more information on this on this very important subject please check out, www.wallbuilders.org
or www.philipjsherman.org
Respectfully, Philip J. Sherman
|
|
A Democracy or
Republic?
Written November 2004
In today's society there are many popular issues regarding our government
and possible changes to it. One example of this would be many people's desire to abolish the Electoral College. Is it not
important that the people understand our government and its design before making such decisions? The Declaration of Independence
says that it is the right of the people to "alter or abolish" (Declaration of Independence, 1776). Though it may
sound like a form of permission to make any and all changes the people wish, the Declaration goes on to say that "[p]rudence,
indeed, will dictate that governments long established, should not be changed for light and transient causes" (Declaration
of Independence, 1776).
Would not the abolition of a government in exchange for a worse one or the attempt to mold
the present system into something it is not lead to disaster for its people? Is it not therefore important that the people
understand their government?
In order to understand what form of government the United States actually is, the
definition of each possibility needs to be fully understood. Following the forming of our nation's government, Noah Webster
wrote his American Dictionary of the English Language, published in 1828. This dictionary gives an insight into the thinking
of the early 19th century and what the Founding Father's meant when they used the terms 'democracy' and 'republic'. According
to this dictionary a democracy is "[g]overnment by the people; a form of government, in which the supreme power is lodged
in the hands of the people collectively, or in which the people exercise the powers of legislation. Such was the government
of Athens." To look at this definition one might call the United States of America a democracy, but Noah Webster's definition
of a republic sheds a bit more light on the issue. "A commonwealth; a state in which the exercise of the sovereign power
is lodged in representatives elected by the people...it differs from a democracy or democratic state, in which the people
exercise the powers of sovereignty in person. Yet the democracies of Greece are often called republics".
These
concepts were understood by James Madison, who wrote of the "two great points of difference between a democracy and a
republic" (Lewis 271). He recognized the similarities between the two, but also saw the differences. "The other
point of difference is, the greater number of citizens and extent of territory which may be brought within compass of republican
than of democratic government; and it is this circumstance principally which renders factious combinations less to be dreaded
in the former than the latter" (Lewis 273).
This is not to say that the term 'democracy' was never used, it
can be found quite easily in historical texts. The Founding Fathers wrote extensively on the new nation and the courses its
government could take. The results were summed up by Benjamin Franklin when he said they had given the people "a republic,
if you can keep it" (qtd. in McManus).
Perhaps the best explanation comes from another of James Madison's
writings:
The first question that offers itself is, whether the general form and aspect of the government be strictly
republican? It is evident that no other form would be reconcilable with the genius of the people of America; with the fundamental
principles of the Revolution; or with that honorable determination which animates every votary of freedom, to rest all our
political experiments on the capacity of mankind for self-government. If the plan of the convention, therefore, be found to
depart from the republican character, its advocates must abandon it as no longer defensible (Lewis 308).
James
Madison and Benjamin Franklin were not the only ones who understood the reasoning behind a Republic. John Marshall, the original
chief justice of the Supreme Court (1801-1835), said "[b]etween a balanced republic and a democracy, the difference is
like that between order and chaos." (qtd. in McManus) John Adams urged for people to remember "democracy never lasts
long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." (qtd.
in Barton 335) Gouverneur Morris referred to democracy as "savage and wild" (qtd. in Barton 335), and John Quincy
Adams said that it is "the most unstable, fluctuating, and short-lived" (qtd. in Barton 335). The feeling of the
Founding Fathers against democracy was addressed by John Adams when he said:
[D]emocracy will soon degenerate into
an anarchy, such an anarchy that every man will do what is right in his own eyes and no man's life or property or reputation
or liberty will be secure, and every one of these will soon mould itself into a system of subordination of all the moral virtues
and intellectual abilities, all the powers of wealth, beauty, wit, and science, to the wanton pleasures, the capricious will,
and the execrable [abominable] cruelty of one or a very few (qtd. in Barton 338).
In the Constitution, it says
that the "United States shall guarantee to every State in the Union a republican form of government" (US Const.,
art.4, sec.4). Yet if you read the Constitution you will not find even one mention of the term 'democracy' or 'democratic'.
Why, if the United States is a democracy, would the Constitution guarantee a republican government and not mention a democracy
even once?
Though the term 'democracy' has been used throughout the years by various politicians, there has never
been any official document that would give credence to calling the United States such a country. Some may consider the line
between 'democracy' and 'republic' to be a thin one, but the documents at the heart of the government and the writings of
those who set them in place point to the United States of America being a republic.
In the 20th century politicians
began to call the United States a 'democracy', and whether they simply didn't know better or didn't care, the American people
have begun to believe that that is truly what this country is. Yet throughout all of this, the ability to prove otherwise
remains if anyone cares to do so. Even now the Encyclopaedia Britannica refers to the United States as "a federal republic"
("United States"). There is a reason the Pledge of Allegiance claims allegiance to a republic, a reason that the
Constitution guarantees one, and a reason that one can find so many writings by the Founding Fathers outlining the virtues
of one. America is, at its heart, a republic.
Works Cited
"United States." Encyclopaedia Britannica
Online. 2004. Encyclopaedia Britannica.
Brown Lib., Virginia Western Comm. Coll., Roanoke, VA. 19 Nov. 2004
.
McManus, John F. "A Republic, If You Can Keep It." The New American 2 Nov. 2000: 1+.
30 Oct. 2004
.
Lewis, John D., ed. Anti-Federalists versus Federalists. Scranton: Chandler Publishing Company, 1967.
Barton, David. Original Intent. 2nd ed. Aledo: WallBuilder Press, 1997.
"democracy." An American Dictionary
of the English Language. 1st ed. 1828.
"republic." An American Dictionary of the English Language. 1st
ed. 1828.
Stubborn Lass © Kyrie Eleison
The following links are ways that
you can make a positive difference in the lives of those that have been personally affected by Hurricane Katrina.
AMERICARES
http://www.americares.org MCCORMICK TRIBUNE FOUNDATION
http://www.mccormicktribune.org
AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE
www.afsc.org MERCY CORPS
www.mercycorps.org
AMERICAN RED CROSS
http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate
OPERATION USA
http://www.opusa.org
CATHOLIC CHARITIES
http://www.catholiccharitiesusa.org/news/
katrina.cfm
THE SALVATION
ARMY
http://www.salvationarmyusa.org/
USNSAHome.htm
THE CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT
http://www.chrisapp.org
UNITED JEWISH COMMUNITIES
https://secure.ujcfederations.org/ft2
/form.html?__id=7500
CONVOY OF HOPE
http://www.convoyofhope.org
VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA
http://www.vva.org/whatsnew/
HurricaneKatrina/index.htm
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES
https://secure.hsus.org/01/
disaster_relief_fund_2005
WORLD VISION
http://www.worldvision.org
ISLAMIC RELIEF
http://www.irw.org/katrina/
<a href="http://www.satellitefamily.com/hughesnet-versus-wildblue.aspx"
title="wild blue internet"><img src="http://www.conersationtree.com/branch.aspx?id=5461"
alt="wild blue internet" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="font-size:10px;"><a
href="http://www.satellitefamily.com/hughesnet-versus-wildblue.aspx"
title="wild blue internet">wild blue internet</a></span>
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
